The crowd at the O2 Arena would have known it was E’casanova, right?

Wrong. I believe he could have easily fooled everyone there at the time. Have you seen this video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1mTtuaaP0M

In it, Navi is just walking outside the arena and everyone is positive he is Michael Jackson. Listen to all the fans screaming his name. He fooled them all and he stood next to them. Whoever was on the stage was a good distance away, so no one would have gotten a real good look. No one would have known that he was not Michael Jackson.

Would you have?

I probably won’t be posting much until next year since it is such a busy time right now. I’ll be leaving the O2 Press Conference. I have said all I can say. Either you believe me or you don’t and I’m not going to force my opinion on you.

Have a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

E’casanova vs. Michael Jackson--Who was it?

This post was inspired by MJTruthSeeker on youtube. I was watching his/her video’s earlier and it got me thinking. Check them out they are worth a watch. The videos are located here: http://www.youtube.com/user/MjTruthSeeker

In the videos, he/she tries to prove that E’casanova was the speaker at the O2 Arena and not Michael Jackson. As I said before, I was not 100% on who I thought it was. I seemed to keep wavering back and forth. But, right now, after watching the videos and doing some research and I am coming to the same conclusion that MJTruthSeeker came to.


Let’s compare them, shall we. Here are the obvious, easy to spot differences.

Michael Jackson:

• Height—5’ 10”
• Right handed

E’casanova:

• Height—not positive.
• left handed

E’casanova’s actual height is hard to tell. I can’t find it anywhere on the internet and in all the pictures, like this one, he seems to be leaning. I would probably put him a little shorter than Michael Jackson, though if I had to guess. So, if E’casanova is slightly shorter than Michael Jackson that would explain the heel on the shoes that I mentioned in a previous post.

Another point I made was that one is right handed and the other is left handed. If you watch a person long enough in situations where they have to move their hands, it is easy to tell if a person is right handed or left handed. For example, I am right handed and my friend is left handed. So, not only do we write with different hand, we also move different hands more often when we talk. We each favor a one hand over the other, she her left and me, my right. If you were to give something to my friend, she would reach out her left hand to take it, while I would reach out my right. We don’t think about what hand we use, it is subconscious and automatic. Though, the differences are subtle, if they studied long enough you can spot a difference.


Example: Dermot O’Leary

I searched and searched the internet to find out if Dermot O’Leary was right or left handed to help prove my argument, but I could not find anything. I would say he is right handed. Since statics show that about 90% of the world is right handed, I would have a very good chance of getting it right if I was just randomly guessing. But, I’m not. Watch how he moves during the conference. He adjusts the, microphone with his right hand, and then when Michael Jackson comes toward him to ask a question, the first thing he does is reach out his right hand to intercept him. So, just by watching him I am pretty confident that Dermot O’Leary is right handed.

Example: Michael Jackson

So, Michael Jackson is right handed, right? Look it up if you don’t believe me. But, if he is right handed, who was at the press conference, because I would say that person is left handed? Here are some stills from the O2 Arena. When the person talks, he moves his left hand the most. That is strange for a right handed person. We might move both hand, butif we are moving one it is normally our right. In the next picture, he calls over Dermot O’Leary, but he beckons with his left hand. Then, he is seen adjusting the microphone with his left. All this pictures are left, left, and left. Not once do you see him raise just his right hand while talking, nor adjust the microphone with just his right. Check out the press conference, again, and look for the movements he makes. They are movements of a left handed person.

These points along with what MJTruthSeeker pointed out in his/her videos leads me to believe that it was not Michael Jackson at the press conference, but E’casanova. If the facts fit, it is normally the correct answer.

The obvious is normally the truth.

Michael Jackson vs. Dermot O’Leary—Height

Most sites on the internet agree that the height of Dermot O’Leary is about 5’ 8” or 5’ 9” and Michael Jackson is about 5’ 10”. So, in this picture everything looks normal, right? Both are standing up straight, and Jackson is slightly taller than O’Leary like he should be.

But, check this out.

As you can see, O’Leary, on the far right, is wearing flat shoes. His height with the shoes is about the same as his height without. But…

On the other hand, you can tell that Michael Jackson was wearing shoes with a heel which probably would add an inch or so to his height. So without, the shoes would Jackson be taller than O’Leary? Probably not, at least not the two inches he should be. So, was it really Michael Jackson at the announcement or an impersonator? You decide.

Here are some other pictures of Michael Jackson. You can see that his shoes had a little bit of a heel, but they aren’t as drastic as at the O2 Arena.

What do you think? Was it him or not?

Dermot O'Leary

The announcer during Michael Jackson’s O2 speech had some interesting things to say about the experience later in an interview.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uA7ZEYp8tk
I wanted to touch on what I thought was strange in what he said.

Right off the bat, Dermot O’Leary says that he got a call the day before to announce Michael Jackson. That seems normal. O’Leary is a major announcer. He is best known for announcing The X Factor and Big Brother’s Little Brother, so it is pretty obvious why he was chosen. The only strange thing was he was called the day before. I’m not positive on how much notice a person is normally given when they will be an announcer at an event, but I think that it is more than a day. Even the interviewers thought that it was crazy and they questioned him over that thinking maybe he had exaggerated it a little. He stuck to his story of the day before and acted like it was no big deal, so maybe it is common, but I just don’t think so.

Later when talking about Michael Jackson giving him a hug, he says that Michael Jackson was “ripped”. That is in obvious contrast to the reports of Michael Jackson being underweight and could not lift a weight. So, which one is the truth? O’Leary had no reason to lie.

Overall, O’Leary said the whole thing “was so weird”, because basically all that was said was “this is it, because this is it, because this is it, thirty times over”. He also says Michael Jackson came to him at the beginning of the announcement to ask if the teleprompter was on. O’Leary, though, believes that Michael Jackson did not need it because all he said was “this is it, because this is it, because this is it”. I just wonder if that was the speech written on the teleprompter, because if it was I agree with O’Leary and see no reason for a teleprompter. The speech was just extremely strange and said absolutely nothing.

So why did he give it?

These or This?

As I said in my previous post, I believe that Michael Jackson's O2 Announcement was the starting point of the clues that were left proving that he is alive. I know I said before that near the beginning of his O2 speech Michael Jackson said, "These will be my final show, performances in London". That is what many news articles say including:

• The BBC-- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7925388.stm


• Time Magazine-- http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1883416,00.html


• ABC-- http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/WinterConcert/story?id=7009523&page=1
  

But, when I kept searching I noticed that other people say he said, "This will be my final show, performances in London", including:

• The Chicago Tribune-- http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2009/mar/06/entertainment/chi-0306-michael-jackson-tour-ftmar06


• Mojo-The Music Magazine-- http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2009/mar/06/entertainment/chi-0306-michael-jackson-tour-ftmar06

So, did he really say these or this? It makes a big difference. The word these means these shows, these performances he was doing in London. But, what does the word this refer to? Did he mean this announcement, as in "This announcement I am giving now will be my final show, performance in London"? Was he telling us in March that the This Is It tour would not happen?

You decide.