Michael Jackson’s Funeral--Movement

I know that I said before that everything was too still to be real and that nothing moved. I still can’t find a single tree swaying in the wind, but I think that I just saw a car moving in the background.










7:05, at this link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qlnGWwU7_8

It is too small to tell for sure what it is, but it is definitely moving. I’m just still confused as to why the trees are not swaying in the wind.

This isn’t even close to all of the strange things that took place at that day. I would love to hear your opinion.

Michael Jackson’s Funeral—No Wind

Firstly, I want to say that it is going to be kind of hard to put all of this information into a blog post. Don’t take what I say as the truth. I will provide all of the links I used, so please verify what I say and make up your own mind.

Now the first time I saw the burial, I had a feeling that something was wrong, but I could not place it. All I remember thinking was that the background looked like it was a green screen. I didn’t know why I thought that and I had no really tangible evidence so I dropped it and moved on. When I was re-watching the videos this week, I thought the same thing and now I think I may have some evidence that backs up a green screen theory. It might not be 100% proof, but it sure will get you thinking.

Green screens are a good way to show a background or an image and make you believe that you are actually in a real place, but actually it is just a picture. A lot of the sets for This Is It used green screens. They showed images from a graveyard to thousands of soldiers and were pretty convincing. The only bad thing though is that they don’t necessarily show movement, sometimes they just show a still image. If you look closely at the footage where the service is actually set up, you will never see a single tree move in the wind. I didn’t, but if someone finds one that does let me know.

For those of you out there right now who think that I’m insane, let me prove that it was actually pretty wind the day of Michael Jackson’s funeral. Here is the proof, go to this link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPMQv7bmESw&feature=channelmESw&feature=channel

Check out the tree on the left at 4:39…










The tree in the center at 5:10 (the tree on the left in the previous shot)…










And at 5:45, watch the cameramen’s equipment…










If you continue to watch at 6:05, the camera pans around to a large tree in the background.

Here is another video to watch, if the previous one was not enough:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GeAzO_QY7w&feature=relatedom/watch?v=7GeAzO_QY7w&feature=related

At 0:25 the camera zooms on an American flag…

If you continue to watch, at 2:40 the wind really picks up and the flag can’t stop moving. After the video pans away from the flag, you can see the fountain water moving with the flag still moving in the background.

So if it was as windy as it looks from the road, then why can’t you see any wind at the ceremony site?
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qlnGWwU7_8

Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJIqyaJhZx0&feature=related

Everything looks so still, too still to be real.

What confuses me though is that I just proved that every detail matches up with Forest Lawn Cemetery in Glendale, and now I’m saying that I think the background was a green screen. It can’t be both can it? We hear helicopters overhead and even see footage from them, so wouldn’t we have seen the green screen if there was one? I don’t know what to think. The burial was just really strange in my opinion, so more to come later.

What do you think? Was it a hoax or not?

Michael Jackson's Funeral

I’m sorry I haven’t posted anything in a while, but I’ve been extremely busy. You wouldn’t believe how much stuff I had to do. But, besides that there really hasn’t been anything new to comment on that someone else has not already brought up until I spotted something strange as I was watching the funeral again.

So, the burial has been questioned from the beginning. Some say everyone was way too happy. Others have read the lips of the people there who talk about Michael being alive. I don’t know if either one is completely true. Acting happy does not also mean that you are not grieving. Some people view funerals as a chance to celebrate a person’s life. Everyone is different. Also, I can’t read lips and I try not to base an argument on what I think someone said. Lip-reading is something that you can very easily mess up. Words can be mistaken and so forth. Even if someone mentions the name Michael, they could be talking about someone else as far as I know. Michael is an extremely common name; millions of people probably have it. Neither you nor I know the full conversation that was said; only the person speaking and the person they are speaking to do. So, I’m not going to use these examples to prove that Michael Jackson is alive; they are too unreliable.

First, I want to point out that the burial actually took place at Forest Lawn Cemetery. Here is an overhead shot that we are given during the ceremony:

To make sure that this was legit and actually Forest Lawn, I pulled up a photo on Google Maps. Here it is:

Both match up perfectly. The roads are the same and the building matches up to the one in the previous picture. Not enough proof for you? Here are some other shots (the first one is Google Maps and the second is from the burial footage):

The gates and road are the same. If you zoom in on both you can see that the building on the other side of the gates matches up.

Here is another similarity:

In the upper right corner you can see a cross in the background. So I tried to find out if a church was nearby and in that direction from the gates and there is one.

Point A in the lower right corner is the front gates and you can see that in the upper right corner there is a church with a cross on top. It fits. It is at the right angle and as you can see in the second picture it is the same as what you see from the gates.

Every building and every tree matches completely with how it is in actual life. So, I must conclude that the funeral actually took place at Forest Lawn, right? There is not the slightest mistake, but I still could not shake the feeling that something was not right. I have had this feeling since I first saw footage from the burial. Now, I think I know what is wrong with it. Here is the funeral if you want to watch it again.

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qlnGWwU7_8

Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LoTWVvGl6I&feature=related

Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJIqyaJhZx0&feature=related

Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDme8OkhBVA&feature=channel

Part 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlTFgsaMMjU&feature=channel

Part 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPMQv7bmESw&feature=channel

Part 7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GeAzO_QY7w&feature=channel

Part 8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwUgrttAmRA&feature=channel

Maybe you will see it too. I’ll post what is wrong tomorrow after I get it typed, but right now my thoughts are kind of jumbled.

beLIEve

Was Conrad Murray’s Child Support Trial fake?

There has been much speculation over the fact that Dr. Conrad Murray had a trial for Child Support in October, but it is now January and there has been no hint of a trial for the death of Michael Jackson. Was this trial fake or are people starting to believe there is a hoax in everything?

First of all, let’s separate the facts from the rumors.

Who is suing Dr. Conrad Murray?
I have seen many people say that Murray is being sued by Nicole Alvarez, an actor who could be a relation to Alberto Alvarez, the body guard who called 911, since they share the name of Alvarez. This is not true. Nicole Alvarez is not suing Conrad Murray. She is his current girlfriend who recently had a child earlier this year with him. The person that is suing him is Nenita Malibiran, a nurse who had a child with him 10 years ago. She claims Murray owes her $13,000. Besides that, not much is known about her, and I can’t seem to find a picture of her.

Was the money he paid with real or did it feature the face of Gilda?
Some say the $700 he paid in Child Support during his trial were not legit $100 bills. That instead of featuring the face Benjamin Franklin, they featured the face of Gilda. Gilda, an old black and white film, features a man faking his death. A scene from this film was featured in This Is It during Smooth Criminal.

Here are the bills Murray paid vs. a normal $100 bill vs. Gilda:

Here they are a little better compared:

See what you want to see, and believe what you want to believe, but I don’t see any similarity between Gilda and the money. Many people out there may disagree with me, but I see the same clothes, hair, nose and mouth as in the picture of Ben Franklin, not the picture of Gilda.

Was the trial fake?
I’m not 100% sure, but I truly don’t believe that it was. Could it have been? Yes, I’ll give you that. But, what would have been the point and why a Child Support case? Just because Murray has a hand in this hoax does not mean that everything he does is related to it. Even if Michael Jackson’s death was not a hoax, Murray can have a Child Support trial even when evidence is being gathered to charge him with murder.

Update: On Monday January 4, 2010, Murray paid Nenita Malibiran $1,003, and he is due back in court in July.

Bend theories to fit facts, but don’t bend facts to fit a single theory.